Skip to content
Wingato

Technical delivery · Development · R&D

We build the software, then we keep it running.

Wingato is the engineering arm of the Appnable group. We run technical delivery and R&D for Appnable, and build directly for our own clients: platforms, integrations and applied AI that has to hold up in production rather than in a demo.

ops.internal

Services

  • webprodhealthy
  • apiprodhealthy
  • workerprodhealthy
  • ai-workflowsprodhealthy
  • webstagingdeploying

Pipeline

  1. build
  2. test
  3. migrate
  4. deploy
  5. smoke

For Appnable

The engineering function

Wingato is where Appnable's technical delivery, development and R&D happen. Group products get built here, prototyped here, and maintained here after launch.

For clients

Software delivery

We take on client engagements directly: platforms, system replacements, integrations and applied AI, delivered by the same team and to the same standard as our own products.

Track record

Two decades of it, behind us.

These are Appnable’s numbers and David Osho’s own delivery record across two decades of enterprise work. Wingato is the engineering function that history now runs through.

Years of enterprise delivery
20+Years of enterprise delivery
Successful implementations
150+Successful implementations
Clients across 15+ countries
100+Clients across 15+ countries
Average ROI improvement
340%Average ROI improvement
Client retention
95%Client retention

What we do

Six things, and we say no to the rest.

01

Product engineering

End-to-end delivery of web platforms and portals, from the first architecture call to the thing running in production with users on it.

02

Applied AI

AI as a feature inside a product people already use, built against evaluation harnesses and cost controls rather than shipped on vibes.

03

Platform and cloud

The infrastructure and delivery pipeline underneath. Usually the part that decides whether the rest of it survives its first month.

04

Business systems and ERP

Getting an organisation off a stack of half-working tools and onto one system, including the migration nobody wants to own.

05

Microsoft 365, Copilot and Office engineering

Getting an organisation the capability it has already paid for in its Microsoft tenant, then building on top of it where the out-of-the-box answer runs out.

06

R&D and prototyping

Feasibility work, prototypes and pitch builds. Some of it becomes a product, some of it proves an idea does not work, which is also a result.

Selected work

What we have shipped.

All work →
Faith and community organisationsLive

A multi-tenant communications and giving platform

Member organisations were running contact lists in spreadsheets, campaigns through three unconnected tools, and donations through a payment link with no reconciliation back to the person who gave.

What we built

  • Multi-tenant architecture with per-tenant isolation, custom subdomains and Entra ID single sign-on
  • Campaign delivery across email, SMS and WhatsApp from one composer, with segmentation over the contact graph
  • Giving, Gift Aid declarations and event management reconciled back to member records
  • A member-facing portal and an admin console over the same tenant model
  • Next.js
  • Node
  • PostgreSQL
  • Azure Container Apps
  • Front Door
  • Entra ID
US procurement and retailIn delivery

Replacing four business systems with one

Quoting, point of sale, product specification and accounting each lived in a different product. Nothing reconciled, every order was re-keyed at least twice, and no one could answer what a job had actually cost.

What we built

  • Odoo 19 implementation mapped to the real procurement process rather than the textbook one
  • Migration off the incumbent POS, quoting and specification tools, with data reconciliation at each step
  • Cutover planning and phased go-live so the business keeps trading through the switch
  • Odoo 19
  • Python
  • PostgreSQL
  • ETL
UK special educationDelivered

Two school sites rebuilt on a fixed fee

A specialist education group ran two sites on ageing builds that were hard to update, slow on mobile and failing basic accessibility for an audience that needed it most.

What we built

  • Two full site rebuilds sharing one component system and content model
  • Accessibility treated as a build requirement rather than an audit at the end
  • Editor tooling so staff can publish without coming back to us
  • Next.js
  • TypeScript
  • Tailwind
  • Azure Static Web Apps

Get in touch

Tell us what is not working.

A conversation with the people who would actually do the work, and an honest answer about whether we are the right fit for it.

Start a conversation